Smile Direct Club Lawsuits: What You Need to Know

Smile Direct Club is a teledentistry company that provides clear teeth aligners to customers without requiring in-person visits to a dentist or orthodontist. The company’s business model has been the subject of several lawsuits, with dentists and orthodontists accusing the company of practicing dentistry without a license and providing substandard care.

In addition to these claims, Smile Direct Club has also faced lawsuits from customers who allege that the company’s aligners caused permanent damage to their teeth or gums. Some customers have also accused the company of false advertising and violating Food and Drug Administration regulations. These lawsuits have resulted in significant legal fees for the company and have raised questions about the safety and effectiveness of its products.

Background

Smile Direct Club is a teledentistry company that provides clear aligners to customers without requiring in-person visits to a dentist or orthodontist. The company was founded in 2014 and has since grown to become one of the largest providers of clear aligners in the United States, with over 750,000 customers as of 2021.

What is Smile Direct Club?

Smile Direct Club is a teledentistry company that provides clear aligners to customers without requiring in-person visits to a dentist or orthodontist. The company uses 3D printing technology to create custom aligners for each customer based on impressions of their teeth that are taken at home using a kit provided by the company.

Why is Smile Direct Club facing lawsuits?

Smile Direct Club has faced a number of lawsuits since its founding, with many of them centered around allegations of practicing dentistry without a license. In some states, it is illegal for anyone other than a licensed dentist or orthodontist to provide orthodontic treatment, and Smile Direct Club has been accused of violating these laws by providing clear aligners without requiring in-person visits with a licensed professional.

What are the allegations against Smile Direct Club?

Some of the specific allegations against Smile Direct Club include:

• Practicing dentistry without a license
• Failing to properly diagnose and treat dental issues
• Misrepresenting the effectiveness and safety of their products
• Violating consumer protection laws by engaging in deceptive advertising practices

These allegations have resulted in a number of lawsuits being filed against the company by both customers and dental professionals. While Smile Direct Club has denied many of the allegations, they have also settled some of the lawsuits out of court.

Current Status of Lawsuits

Overview of Lawsuits Against Smile Direct Club

Smile Direct Club, a teledentistry company that provides clear plastic dental aligners, has been involved in several lawsuits. These lawsuits range from antitrust claims to false advertising and breach of contract.

Pending Lawsuits

As of the current date, there are multiple pending lawsuits against Smile Direct Club. One lawsuit involves a group of orthodontists who are suing the company for false advertising. The orthodontists claim that Smile Direct Club is misleading consumers by suggesting that their aligners are as effective as traditional braces, which is not always the case. Another pending lawsuit involves a group of Smile Direct Club customers who claim that the company’s aligners caused them dental problems.

Resolved Lawsuits

Smile Direct Club has also faced several lawsuits that have been resolved. One such lawsuit was filed by the California Dental Board, which accused Smile Direct Club of practicing dentistry without a license. The case was eventually settled, with Smile Direct Club agreeing to pay a fine and change their business practices to comply with California law.

Settlements

Smile Direct Club has also settled several lawsuits out of court. In one such case, the company settled a lawsuit with the Better Business Bureau over their advertising practices. The settlement required Smile Direct Club to change their advertising and marketing practices. Overall, Smile Direct Club has faced several legal challenges in recent years. While some lawsuits have been resolved or settled, others are still pending. It remains to be seen how these lawsuits will affect the company’s future operations.

Impact on Customers

Experience of Smile Direct Club customers

Smile Direct Club has faced several lawsuits in recent years, which have impacted its customers. Many customers have reported negative experiences with the company, including issues with the quality of the aligners, poor customer service, and delays in receiving their orders. Some customers have also reported experiencing pain and discomfort while using the aligners.

Customer complaints

Customers have filed numerous complaints against Smile Direct Club, alleging false advertising, violations of FDA regulations, and other issues. In some cases, customers have been forced to seek legal action to resolve their disputes with the company.

One of the central complaints against Smile Direct Club is that the company does not provide adequate supervision or oversight of the teeth straightening process. Unlike traditional orthodontic treatments, which are overseen by licensed professionals, Smile Direct Club relies on remote monitoring and self-reporting by customers to track their progress. This has led some customers to question the safety and effectiveness of the treatment.

Compensation for affected customers

Smile Direct Club has faced significant legal and financial consequences as a result of the lawsuits filed against it. In some cases, the company has been required to pay substantial settlements to affected customers.

For example, in 2020, Smile Direct Club agreed to pay $8.2 million to settle a class-action lawsuit filed by customers who alleged that the company had engaged in false advertising and other deceptive practices. The settlement provided compensation to eligible customers who had purchased aligners from the company between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019.

However, not all customers have been satisfied with the compensation provided by Smile Direct Club. Some have argued that the company’s settlements do not adequately address the harm caused by its actions, and that affected customers should be entitled to additional compensation.

Impact on the Industry

Smile Direct Club has been involved in several lawsuits since its inception. These lawsuits have had a significant impact on the direct-to-consumer orthodontic industry. This section will discuss the regulatory response to Smile Direct Club lawsuits, the impact on other direct-to-consumer orthodontic companies, and the future of direct-to-consumer orthodontics.

Regulatory response to Smile Direct Club lawsuits

The lawsuits against Smile Direct Club have prompted regulatory bodies to take a closer look at the industry. In 2019, the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO) filed complaints with dental boards in 36 states, alleging that Smile Direct Club was practicing dentistry without a license. The complaints led to investigations in several states, and Smile Direct Club was forced to stop accepting new customers in Georgia and Alabama.

In response to the lawsuits, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a warning to the industry, stating that direct-to-consumer orthodontic companies must have a licensed dentist or orthodontist involved in treatment planning and overseeing care. The warning was seen as a victory for traditional orthodontic practices, which had been fighting against the rise of direct-to-consumer orthodontics.

Impact on other direct-to-consumer orthodontic companies

The lawsuits against Smile Direct Club have also had an impact on other direct-to-consumer orthodontic companies. In 2019, Candid, a competitor of Smile Direct Club, was sued by a former employee who alleged that the company was using unlicensed dental assistants to perform orthodontic procedures. The lawsuit was settled out of court, but it raised concerns about the industry as a whole.

The lawsuits have also led to increased scrutiny of direct-to-consumer orthodontic companies by investors. In 2019, Smile Direct Club went public, but its stock price plummeted after it was hit with a series of lawsuits. The company’s struggles have made investors wary of other direct-to-consumer orthodontic companies, and many have struggled to raise capital.

Future of direct-to-consumer orthodontics

The lawsuits against Smile Direct Club have raised questions about the future of direct-to-consumer orthodontics. While the industry has grown rapidly in recent years, the lawsuits have highlighted the risks associated with the model. Direct-to-consumer orthodontic companies will need to address these concerns if they are to continue to grow.

One potential solution is for direct-to-consumer orthodontic companies to work more closely with traditional orthodontic practices. By partnering with licensed dentists and orthodontists, direct-to-consumer companies can ensure that patients receive high-quality care while still offering the convenience and affordability that have made the industry so popular.

Conclusion

The Smile Direct Club lawsuits have shed light on the importance of transparency and accuracy in advertising and the potential risks of remote orthodontic treatment. While the company has argued that its aligners are safe and effective, some customers have reported problems and concerns, and several lawsuits have been filed against the company.

The lawsuits have raised questions about the company’s business practices, including its use of non-disclosure agreements, its arbitration clauses, and its marketing claims. Some dentists and orthodontists have also criticized the company for providing treatment without adequate supervision or evaluation, and for potentially causing harm to patients.

Despite the controversy, Smile Direct Club continues to operate and expand, and many customers have reported positive experiences with the company. However, it is important for consumers to be aware of the potential risks and limitations of remote orthodontic treatment, and to carefully consider their options and do their research before choosing a provider.

You can also read:

• The 10 Biggest Honda Lawsuits in Company History
• The 10 Biggest Getty Images Lawsuits in Company History
• The 10 Biggest Lawsuits Against McDonald’s: Analyzing High-Profile Cases
• Doordash Lawsuits: Exploring Recent Legal Battles and Their Impact
• Cedar Rapids Small Business Owners Face Legal Battles in Recent Lawsuits